Photo via Pexels
VAR — the Video Assistant Referee — has reshaped how Premier League matches are officiated since its introduction in 2019. We explain exactly what it checks, how it works and what it cannot review.
The Video Assistant Referee — universally known as VAR — was introduced into the Premier League ahead of the 2019–20 season following a trial period in other competitions. It represents the most significant change to football officiating in decades, and few innovations in the sport have generated more sustained debate.
VAR checks four specific match-changing situations, and only four. These are defined precisely by IFAB (the International Football Association Board) and are not at the discretion of individual leagues to expand:
It is equally important to understand what falls outside VAR's scope:
The VAR team operates from Stockley Park in west London — a centralised hub where officials monitor all Premier League matches simultaneously using live video feeds from multiple camera angles. Each match has a dedicated VAR and an assistant VAR (AVAR).
The process begins with the on-field referee making their initial decision. The VAR team watches the relevant footage and assesses whether a “clear and obvious error” has been made. This threshold — “clear and obvious” — is the key standard for all VAR reviews outside of offside. It is designed to prevent VAR from overturning every marginal decision; only demonstrably incorrect calls should be changed.
If the VAR team identifies a potential clear and obvious error, there are two possible outcomes:
Despite its stated purpose — eliminating clear and obvious errors — VAR has generated considerable frustration since its Premier League introduction.
The central criticism is inconsistency. Decisions that appear similar to fans watching replays at home have been treated differently in different matches, raising questions about whether the “clear and obvious” threshold is being applied consistently. The Premier League has responded by publishing regular explanations of key VAR decisions through their PGMOL (Professional Game Match Officials Limited) communications, though many fans remain unconvinced.
A second criticism relates to the atmosphere inside grounds. Goals are now routinely followed by a period of uncertainty rather than immediate celebration, as fans await confirmation that VAR has not intervened. For supporters attending matches, this delay erodes the spontaneity that has always defined live football.
A third concern is handball. The handball law — particularly as it applies to ball-to-arm incidents in the build-up to goals — has been modified several times since VAR's introduction, as the sport attempts to find a workable standard that distinguishes deliberate handball from accidental contact. This has been a source of ongoing confusion for players, managers and supporters alike.
Despite these criticisms, VAR has undeniably corrected errors that would previously have stood — goals scored from offside positions, wrongful penalty awards, and incidents of serious foul play missed by officials in real time. The debate is not so much about whether technology should assist officials, but about how that assistance should be calibrated and communicated.
The Premier League's tactical landscape has shifted. High pressing remains in vogue, but a new generation of compact, low-block sides are finding ways to neutralise it. We examine both approaches.
Over 30% of Premier League goals this season have come from set pieces. We examine why dead-ball situations have become the most important tactical battleground in English football.
The inverted full-back is the most tactically influential position innovation of the last decade. We explain what it is, how it works, and which players do it best.